Steel Soldiers::Military Vehicles Supersite
Mark Forums Read

Reload this Page



» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
View Single Post
Old 07-23-2007, 18:31   #9 (permalink)
Recovry4x4
Fleet Admiral/Moderator
 
Recovry4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Loxahatchee, FL
Posts: 21,735
Recovry4x4 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: RE: air

Quote:
Originally Posted by nf6x
Without doubt, the -209 series of TMs for the deuce is the worst example of technical writing I have ever encountered. The entire heaping pile stinks of having been written by amateur writers with no personal experience working on vehicles, under the direction of bureacratic managers with even less pertinent knowledge. Besides being poorly-written in generic terms, it also thoroughly fails to consider the needs of its target audience. It truly represents the pinnacle of sucking.
While I agree the 76 or so versions are horrible, the 1965 versions are pretty darned nice. I know I use them almost exclusively and so does Bjorn. I'm sure ACE won't leave the house without is TM 9-8022 and I have that too but I don't find it as useful as the 65 209 stuff.
__________________
http://www.steelsoldiers.com/technical-manuals/

This Steel Soldier Honors the Living Memory of David Frankenhauser, 1954-2009.
May you Sail in the Grace of Our Lord, Chaplain!

“The earnest prayer of a righteous person has great power and produces wonderful results.” James 5:16.
Recovry4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15.


Copyright 1999-2012 SteelSoldiers.Com No information or photos to be used without permission.