Steel Soldiers::Military Vehicles Supersite
Mark Forums Read

Reload this Page



» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Online Users: 209
21 members and 188 guests
AC , aiuduin , area52 , clinto , Detonation , Dieselking22 , hwcurtice , Isaac-1 , JAYHAWK 1962 , jeepzilla47 , jets1959 , junkyard dog , K9Vic , piodik , sojourner , SRB1976 , st8kfinger , wdbtchr , woodywood , wsucougarx , zyxwvu44
Most users ever online was 902, 10-29-2011 at 04:09.
View Single Post
Old 03-20-2008, 20:26   #4 (permalink)
builder77
4 Star General
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,150
builder77 is on a distinguished road
Default RE: GL loadout damage

How is GL saying no help loading out supposed to eliminate their liability if they do end up helping. Either GL is responsible for damage or the employee is. I would think there would be more liability if they said they will help, but accept no liability then if they will not help but do so anyways. They would be breaking there own rules in that case.
builder77 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18.


Copyright 1999-2012 SteelSoldiers.Com No information or photos to be used without permission.