Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: 5 ton vs 2.5 frame differences?

  1. #21
    Sergeant cwedge411's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Boston/Ma
    Posts
    55
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts

    Default

    if you are going to use a 5.9 go with a duece. A m818 weighs in at 22k and thats the lightest 5 ton
    2005 F-350 Powerstroke 6.0 Dually
    2008 Hummer H3 Alpha ( LS2 5.3 v8 )
    1970 Kaiser m818 Super Singled (46's)

  2. #22
    4 Star General Csm Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Hattiesburg, Mississippi
    Posts
    3,989
    Thanks
    1,965
    Thanked 1,962 Times in 940 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwedge411 View Post
    if you are going to use a 5.9 go with a duece. A m818 weighs in at 22k and thats the lightest 5 ton
    Actually the 931A2 is lighter than 20k and I would say a older 5 ton with the multi fuel and singles might be even lighter. The 809 series are some of the heaviest.

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
    Jeff Davis
    SGM G-4 NCOIC Mississippi State Guard
    Hattiesburg, Mississippi
    (601)264-3453

    M931A2 2012 Camp Shelby rebuild
    M928A2
    M927A1 USMC ISO BED
    M927
    M923A2 WAR WAGON GUN TRUCK
    M816/936 Half Breed
    M1028/31 Combat Vet
    M1028 Phoenix
    M1010
    2-M1008's
    4-M1009's
    XM971 TRAILER Mobile HQ
    M129A4 Desert Storm Memorial
    M295a1
    MEP-002A
    2-MEP-003A
    MEP-006
    M101A2/3
    M1101
    M116A2
    M116A3/tool trailer

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Csm Davis For This Useful Post:

    Jbulach (09-27-2019)

  4. #23
    4 Star General Jbulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Sunman Indiana
    Posts
    1,693
    Thanks
    2,416
    Thanked 1,093 Times in 637 Posts

    Default 5 ton vs 2.5 frame differences?

    Ok, back to the original question.

    My 5ton frame is 9x3”od, by 5/16” thick. Assuming Tobys dimensions are outside, and correct, in the grand scheme of things I wouldn’t call 1” taller and 1/16” thicker x2, way heavier. If your already dead set on 5ton axles, that little bit of weight doesn’t sound worth tearing a second truck down just for a small weight savings. Why not just stay with the pickup frame, if the trucks just going to be an old school monster truck, and not see any real abuse? I think even 2-1/2 ton axles would suite your application, but if it where me I would go with csmdavis idea and just throw the Ford cab on an m939a2 tractor and call it excellent. Then again I do weird things...IMG_7610.JPG
    M925A2

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Jbulach For This Useful Post:

    Csm Davis (10-07-2019)

  6. #24
    4 Star General snowtrac nome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    western alaska
    Posts
    1,549
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 751 Times in 492 Posts

    Default

    My thoughts on the subject are weight and tractive force of the tires are going to require a big motor to see any performance what you need to get that thing going is torque. if it was me I think I would go duce frame, 5 ton axles and 8.3 cummins.that would be the best compromise between torque and weight. Also consider lmtv axles they have final reduction in the hubs which means less weight in the pumpkin and axle shafts and more clearance at the differentials.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to snowtrac nome For This Useful Post:

    Csm Davis (10-07-2019)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •