Search results

. Might be worth deleting that last line in your post.

. I also have a Wisconsin Case Case No. TR-11-0016 answering "In the Matter of a Denial of a Registration" on a Chevy Blazer where the MIL-STD was used to put this case in favor of the MV owner. So, don't hesitate to whip out the book of rules and use them to your benefit! .

. Don't believe any of them would pass. It wasn't part of the specifications. Notice too that when you are ripping down the highway and overtake a military convoy - they are riding on the same roads that you do. They don't have to comply and don't care.

. Nicely said. No drama, just the cold hard facts!

. I would say that recruiting everybody you know in Washington State to send a letter to your elected officials in support of HB 1439 will help. SEMA is involved and if you can toss support for them as well - another plus there as well.

. AND somebody needs to help the local government napoleons understand that the SF97 is a document from our "Big National Guberment" that releases the truck from the military to its first civilian owner. You can't go back and get the SF97 form a second time or get a new one for an old truck.