No, I was being mean.
Pretty obvious if you want to improve performance you need to change things, A/F ratio included. If you had extra fuel before then add a turbo you might have to cut fuel back (like my deuce) to keep power and EGT under control. If you don't have extra fuel, like my 5T, adding a turbo by itself does very little. You do get a feeble extra 15psi push on the piston on the intake stroke. That extra air is great for cooling the EGT, pistons and ex valves... Cleans up smoke too. All good for the engine.
The NHC250 compression ratio is 15.8. The Pittsburgh Power site listed c/r for the various outputs. The NHC250 being highest, the lowest about 1 point below (450 HP?) Engines in between about 1/4 point increments. That's from memory and it was a long time ago. C/R is not much of a problem when dealing with adding 15psi at 2100. At 36 or 40 psi, well sure.
We are talking 10-20% more power here. On 240hp (the NHC250 rating) that 50 hp at best. Probably less. I don't think that's gonna make the 5 ton Rockwells cry (they weighing 1200- 1500 lb each). Same for tranny and clutch, in my opinion. There are big safety factors built into these old army trucks, and I don't mind talking a tiny slice out of them in exchange for a few more pony's.
Concerns like the lack of piston squirters are, so far, unfounded, which is why I offered the progress report. I never expected piston problems with max EGT in the 6-700*F range. It's lower tan before. That'll make a few parts happy. Cam flex, slightly higher intake temp (due to no intercooler, 15psi might be 230*F on a hot summer day) , lack of steel top pistons, head gaskets...are not causing problems.
Oh, and the turbo I used is a Holset, as stated earlier.
The only thing I might change at this point is going to a 17 button, instead of the current 20 (27 was stock).