• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

Search results

  1. citizensoldier

    Why the Multi-Fuel and not the Mack?

    congrats on that tractor !! I watched it but to far for me to haul 19 thousand pounds.. Not in bad shape and with a Mack engine you got a good price IMHO.. Keep us posted on her progress. Are you going to restore it? I thought maybe someone on the site picked up that rare gem..heheheh
  2. citizensoldier

    Why the Multi-Fuel and not the Mack?

    This one sold for a good price last week. Anybody here get it? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=005&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=150111688427&rd=1,1
  3. citizensoldier

    Why the Multi-Fuel and not the Mack?

    Well it was put in the light that the owner of the company was not going to change anything to do with the design of their motor. They had plenty of work and was of the mind set that there desighn was superior and would not bend to the armys requests? Yes P off is a bit harsh but thats the way...
  4. citizensoldier

    Why the Multi-Fuel and not the Mack?

    Its my understanding they put Macks in them for three years. The Army wanted Mack to make changes to the engine and Mack told them to piss off.. Not changing there stuff! = contract termenation.This is the story I recieved from a very credable soarce... Dont have any hard facts to back it up...
Top