Search results

I would like to read the contract- but given that Government Liquidation just "invented" the $60 fee when they were forced to start issuing SF-97's again I tend to believe it is not included in the contract.

I meant specific to military surplus sales. Prior to the whole fiasco of Government Liquidation, the process was simple. Stuff was sold at whatever DRMO it was turned in at, and you got your SF-97 when you bought the truck. Ahh the good old days- when you showed up, looked at the stuff, bid on...

It is different, because it is something was was done for free before. Most folks here don't remember how things were done before GL. I do. Your SF-97 came for the final bid price. Now we pay more- for crappier service. Would I not lower my price? Maybe, maybe not- but in resale the name...

On a duece $60 isn't a big deal. On a trailer, it is. But that doesn't matter-what matters is that there should be no charge for the SF-97. Just because Government Liquidation has proven they can be so incomptent that they can screw it all up doesn't mean we should be happy to pay them $60...

Have people forgotten before that when you got it with the sale, no problems. Government Liquidation screwed everyone when they stopped doing SGF-97's, then as a solution for the problem they created they started charging more money- and we should be glad that they are charging for what used...