Search results

Yes when compared to the sickest one they tested, they never listed the HP at the wheels on the one they actually modified only that ONE of the trucks tested had only 113HP to the ground and certainly did not clarify that was the truck they started with. the "rule of thumb" is 15% loss in drive...

Actually that does not change my beliefs at all, to start with it is only one prototype, I see no empirical evidence that the intercooler was necessary or actually added to the performance' Another thing is they stated that ONE of the trucks tested only had 113HP to the wheels, if it was making...

Well I stand corrected! BUT actually none of the pictures show a turbo or intercooler on a HMMWV and why would Banks use the label "sidewinder" when that was the offset turbo as used in the 6.2L pickup trucks not a center mount, I need more "proof" as in actual pictures of the installed units...

I thought the consensus is an intercooler only adds power lag on the IDI 6.5L because of the limited amount of boost the engine can handle. I have serious doubts any 6.5L can handle 300HP in stock form. Even Banks, the folks that forgot as much about turbocharging than most of us will ever know...