• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

 

Search results

  1. coachgeo

    Ready to test the new configuration

    nice quality in video.... too bad the camera person turned the thing wrong direction while filming. Just tell camera person to always keep the camera eye on back at 12:00 and all will be good.
  2. coachgeo

    Ready to test the new configuration

    hmm.... so you also lost 320lb between front and back. Unfortunate. As of now front to back weight ratio is yikes 67% front / 33% rear; though a second spare back there will help bring that back up closer to OEM of 63/37. guess you will need a huge ballast in rear (around 4500lb) for...
  3. coachgeo

    Ready to test the new configuration

    thinking of weight balance.. maybe a scrap Mack truck engine block or something and put it back where the spare is sitting or at the spot you have the crane storage box . Put it slung as low as can between chassis rails?..
108,496members
163,760threads
2,303,964posts
1,454online users
Top
✖
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks