Search results

Forgive me,maybe I was a bit harsh,but you are comparing a 30 yr.old na diesel to a modern great engine,I love the ls motors but don't want one in a cucv.Look at the expense of both installs and make up your mind.

If you are still 50/50 you should go the with 6.0 ls motor.It will out perform the 6.2 diesel all around.If you were a diesel fan the decision would have already been made. That 6.0 should be about 400hp and 400 ft lbs tq.With a 373 gear and your nv trans. you will be happy.If it was my rig I...

I have a N/A 6.2 in my 86 1009 with 2 1/2 inch flowmaster super 44s,very mild sound,no advils needed.I have been told it is the best sounding diesel they ever heard.

Please ditch the banks and the 6.0l and run nat. asp. with the Stans headers!I would love to hear a 6.2 with headers and 2 1/2 pipes into a nice chambered flowmaster.Maybe super 44s.Bet it would sound awesome.

Stans headers are for naturally aspirated 6.2s,not turbo.A 6.2 with good batts.a good inj. system and a block heater good to -10.If its less than -10 you should stay home..

The more you keep it close to stock the better,and you will get better mpg with the diesel,with a lot less work and headaches.Then you can give me the ls 6.0 for my 79 Malibu,its looking for a 500hp motor.LOL.