Search results

June 16th, 2014. Could it be that the original inspector's stamp on the Data Plate could be proven as acceptance of the vehicle to serve in the military in its designed role, as inspectors in the military do not stamp equipment that does not pass contract inspection. It should not require the...

June 15th, 2014. gents: I have extracted the pertinent clause in the letter above, even if the gentlemen were discussing Ferretts, not this section which passes the exemption down to subsequent owners of US Military vehicles sold surplus. Not that it does not apply to the M151, and likely also...

June 14th, 2014. Bette Davis had it quite right, getting old isn't for sissies. See letter below referred to in my post No. 60 above! TYPE: Interpretation-NHTSA DATE: March 16, 1994 FROM: John Womack -- Acting Chief Counsel, NHTSA TO: John M. Tolliday -- President, Dayman USA Inc...

June 14th, 2014. Before this thread gets locked, please permit me to point out the following letter from the United States Attorney General as regards the grandfathering of vehicles built for the U.S. Military services in regards to Federal Highway Safety regulations, and DO note this applies...