• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

 

M1007 - CUCV Suburban Clone Build Thread

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
Hmm, I screwed up where the pictures went in the post and got an extra too. Oh well.

Anyone have comments on the rear spoiler? I have read that they keep the back glass clear of rain when driving at speed and also found mention of better mpg. Yet, newer cargo door trucks don't use them. I figure there is a reason.
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
Went "fishing" this afternoon. Caught a TH400/VSS NP241 from one of the square bodies that came from Joe. Colton came home just as I had it hanging and said I looked like one of those fish catch pictures.
 

Attachments

Warthog

Moderator
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
13,775
227
63
Location
OKC, OK
Teach a man to fish.............

So where is the crack in the case? Tranny or transfer?

With all the different parts you now have on hand you should be able to build you almost dream machine.
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
The 241 was full of fluid when I pulled the drain plug. The 400 was full to the empty dip stick hole with mostly water. I left it hanging like in the picture over night with a 1 gallon drip pain under it. This morning almost a gallon of red fluid had dripped out. I think the 241 was full and not contaminated.

I did see what could be a hair line crack on one of the upper webbing of the t-case mount. But it could just be a casting mark. I won't know until we clean it up.

Now that it is the hot part of the day. I will go out and try to hot wire the windows up on that truck so everything stays nice inside. That truck has a super clean body underneath.

Those auto locking front hubs must engage a lot. The front drive shaft front u-joint was very hard to get un bolted and the caps were dry. I don't hint it was original.
 
Last edited:

Recovry4x4

LLM/Member 785
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
34,014
1,814
113
Location
GA Mountains
I could be wrong but the rear spoiler was mostly seen on tailgate trucks. Its main function was to creat a downforce area to keep exhaust from vortexing in the back window. My 91 was a tailgte truck and had that exhaust issue with the window down.
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
Kenny,
That is the best explanation for the real spoiler I have found yet. Thank you. We pulled it off and I really don't plan to put it back on. Making the mounting holes water proof should be fun though.

I did manage to hot wire the front windows on the '90. Now it is water tight.

We will probably finish swapping in 3 leaf M1009 front springs in the next day or so.

The GEP heads are warped. I did a fast dirty check on Friday. We still need to clean off the block deck to check it.

The barn doors which were off of the '90 and destined for the Cowdog finally got primed yesterday on both sides. I don't know why I always seem to be doing body work in 100° heat, but it always seem to work out that way. Here they are ready for paint on the inside and mounting on the truck for outside paint. Of course I haven't even started doing any prep on the truck or the front four doors yet. They are next while the truck and engine get messed with by my students. I hope to bring the truck home next month for all the body work. When it is even hotter out of course.
 

Attachments

Recovry4x4

LLM/Member 785
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
34,014
1,814
113
Location
GA Mountains
I love the panel doors. Im currently back in the market for an early 2000s burb. I can't quit.
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
The adaptor to go from a 1987 TH400 to a NP208 is the exact same part number as the same part going from a 1990 TH400 to a NP241. If anybody was curious.

Since the head gaskets for some reason on the GEP engine were blocking all water flow to the heads. The heads were warped as a result. The block is ok though. The replacement heads I have are the 60° intake bolt center turbo heads. Lots of research online convinced me the best way of making a NA intake fit the heads was to drill the intake mounts.

A 29/64 drill bit going straight down on a CUCV 6.2 intake sitting on its top makes the job not take very long. I have a set of rusted heads bolted to the 6500 for intake fitting purposes. Now that I know the intake will fit and the bolts will thread. I am pretty sure 7/16 wedge washers will work for the 11 short mounts. I haven't figured out how to do the 5 tall ones yet. Here are some pictures of the intake sitting on the block and one of the heads that will get used.
 

Attachments

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
That is what I plan to do Rich. I just wanted to see if I could make it so the J code intake would fit the heads with the 60° intake bolts. Now that I know it does and can be bolted on. I will refine what I have. It is a dry intake that really only is going to be required to hold in about 10-15 psi of boost. It isn't rocket science.

There were two versions of the GEP 6500 Optimizer. Center mount turbo with the 60° intake bolts and the detuned NA with normal 90° intake bolts. This engine is the detuned one. However, the replacement heads are all for the turbo version.

I don't see any cracks in the heads that came on the engine and Joe has a set of good GEP heads waiting for me to come pick up. So, I could spend money getting the originals plained or about the same amount round trip getting the other heads from Joe. This option was free since the heads were already here. Plus, I wanted to see if I could do it.

I have one of those passenger side exhaust manifolds you were looking for but didn't see your post until you had already purchased some. Sorry about that.
 

richingalveston

Well-known member
1,715
120
63
Location
galveston/Texas
I am watching.
I want to upgrade to a 6.5 gep but was hoping to take everything from my 6.2 and put it on the 6.5 long block.
I think I would need a different IP but everything else should bolt up.

I have a banks turbo. I want to use the same manifolds if I can. Not sure how a banks 6.2 turbo would do on a 6.5. not sure I can put a different turbo on the banks manifold.
I want to keep the two alternators and I have a high volume hydraulic pump with remote reservoir. I believe I am going to make a front cross over work so I hope to be able to keep the manifolds.

Just want the 6.5 reliable block and heads with just a little more power. The 6.2 with a banks, if feel like it could go boom at any time and want to start working on my back up plan.

please keep posting the info
Rich
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
The hot set up for the Banks manifold. Which for a square body is probably the best manifold to use. Is to put the turbo Banks sold for the 6.9/7.3 Ford diesels on it. It is bigger, has a waste gate and spools up from idle. There are several online threads and stories about doing this to a 6.2/6.5.

We got the new heads on and torqued down a few minutes ago. It is amazing how many little decisions are involved in a build like this. I just don't trust the plastic "buttons" that hold the stamped steel rocker arms on the shaft. I was going to remove them and put 1/4" bolts/nuts with nylon locks in there instead. I stopped by Fastenal last night to get the nuts. They only had grade 2. So, cast iron rockers from a 6.2 it is! I turned the shafts over even though there was very, very little evidence of wear and got them torqued down too. Tomorrow will be moving the injectors over, putting on valve covers and maybe having time to do a compression check. If that is all good we will go with the injector lines and start trying to make it run.

That is what my "engine" class got done. My "drive train" class put M1009 3 leaf springs on the front to replace the 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton 2 leaf springs. I was thinking it would raise the front of the truck some. It didn't. They are flatter and the front cross member which I measured before is exactly the same distance from the ground with nothing else being done to the truck. I like the ride of the M1009 trucks and didn't want this Suburban to be all squishy in the front.

My "body" class can now start messing with the rear bumper and rear a/c install. I wouldn't let them do anything until the truck was back on its springs because I wanted an accurate measure of the lift if any from the springs. I am back to trying to make a M1008 step bumper fit. We just got rid of all the CUCV mounts and brackets. We will make the bumper fit up next to the body. Then make the shackle mounts securely fit however they can.

I started taking apart the best of all front doors I have at home the other day. Of course, this is the one with the burned out and stuck all the way up window motor. Once all the little cuts on both hands and arms scab over, I will finish taking it apart in a few days.


Rich I also found in my research that the 1996 and up serpentine belt system had an option for a second alternator. I have never seen one in person, but that has been making me curious. I like the 24 volt starter and dual alternators of the CUCV trucks. However, I have 2 1992-1994 serpentine set ups and will go with that for now. Maybe.


Here is a thread with info about the Ford Banks turbo, the dual alternators and a bunch of other neat things:

http://ck5.com/forums/threads/one-piece-at-a-time-my-1985-diesel-suburban.318256/

It is very long, but lots of good ideas and experiences to learn from.
 

richingalveston

Well-known member
1,715
120
63
Location
galveston/Texas
So what I need to get is a GEP turbo 6.5 long block. put a 6.5 manual IP.
From the 6.2 I use the rocker arms, intake, my banks exhaust manifold, all my alternators and brackets unless I find the special serpentine system.

I then just put on a bigger banks turbo

That sounds too simple, what am I missing besides a bunch of $'s at this time.
If it is that simple, I have everything apart right now, I would be tempted to try and find the parts and get it done.

I don't mind the many belts at this time, I can do without the serpentine but would really love to move up to a 6.5 just for the reliability of it.

keep us posted on your build
Rich
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
You want the DB2 with the .31" plungers. They came on the 6.5. Here is a great thread about the pump numbers. I can't find it to link it right now. Diesel Page:

db2-4911-the magic, the myth, the mystery

Search for that over there and you will understand the pumps better.
 

richingalveston

Well-known member
1,715
120
63
Location
galveston/Texas
Not trying to hijack your build thread but I may be closer to my end goal than I thought.

correct me if I am wrong but I need this : http://leroydiesel.com/products/p400-6-5-long-block/

a correctly built DB2 pump and banks 7.3 turbo

and I can move everything else from my 6.2 to have a running 6.5 gep?

Other than the cost of the gep I would do it now and sell my 6.2 parts. Any one have a good cheap GEP out there for sale.

Thanks, please correct any errors
Rich
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
Rich, that is a P400, not a 6500. the P400 has the built in stud girdle and a cast aluminum oil pan. You already have a lift on your M1009 so a different cross member would be needed to make it fit your truck. Most people need to do the lift too. Give the seller a call or write to see what they say about it fitting a square body.

We swapped over the injectors this morning. All but 1 of them was loose on the original heads. As in just touch it with a wrench and it unscrewed. I remember having to hold the injectors to get the lines off last month but didn't think about that as a possible loss of compression area until today. They are installed and tight now.
 

richingalveston

Well-known member
1,715
120
63
Location
galveston/Texas
http://leroydiesel.com/products/amg-optimizer-long-block/

I think I pasted the wrong link. They have both the P400 and optimizer. they call one GEP optimizer and the other GEP p400.

They have an oil pan supposedly for either to fit the square body. I am just looking for a motor with a reliable bottom end and a little more power to help the 4l80E and turbo to help with altitude sickness.

I know once I get the turbo running on my 6.2 I will be pushing it.
 

Barrman

Well-known member
5,163
1,572
113
Location
Giddings, Texas
It is amazing how the two of us who live below 500 feet are both building trucks with engines that will let us get to and enjoy the mountains. While bringing all our junk along at the fastest speed we can possibly go.

Yes, the Navistar 506 block is the one you want. Better metal for the entire block, smaller outside main cap bolts to keep metal in the block, one piece rear main seal and it looks like the Navistar cast 567 heads. They also have better metal and supposedly better coolant flow.


The heads are where it gets tricky, kind of. GEP made two versions of the Optimizer 6500. Detuned NA which didn't have the piston oil squirters and probably has square stamped pre combustion chambers. The turbo version has the diamond stamped pre cups which are a little bit wider to give more fuel to the more air coming through, it will have the piston squirt oilers and even though the heads are exactly the same other wise. The intake bolts will be at a 60° angle to the head. My pictures in post 88 show how I am dealing with putting the 60° heads on a NA 6500 using a CUCV 6.2 intake. If that didn't work I was going to buy a center mount turbo intake and figure out how to plumb the turbo outlet into it.

GEP lecture over. Now for a turbo lecture. We have nice thick air here in our part of Texas. A stock NA 6.2 or 6.5 has gobs of torque right off idle because of its 21.5 or so compression ratio. No, we won't win a drag race, but they get around pretty darn good until about 45-50 mph. Then the square body starts really acting like an air brake and the engine is starving for air too. Don't forget the 6.2 was designed to have the same power and double the mpg of a 305 gas 2 barrel just a few years after 55 mph became the law of the land. They didn't have to go faster than 55.

But, tooling along at 55 mph is great until you hit a hill and or a head wind. The Banks turbo was made for that situation. At speed down the highway and needing more umph. They flatten the hills great. So good in fact that GM actually offered a Banks option for the diesel trucks. I think I saw a thing where it was a $3,400 option you could check at the dealership and they would install it for you.

Dodge came out with the Cummins a few years after Banks made the Sidewinder, Congress started raising the speed limit bit by bit and fuel went back down below $1.00 a gallon by the time GM came out with the 6.5. GM made the 6.5 with a waste gate so boost could be built at idle and used at all engine speeds. But, they didn't lower the compression ratio so you really couldn't hit more than 8-12 psi without something blowing off, breaking or over heating. Ford went computer controlled IP and lower compression when they did the first 7.3 Power Stroke. (Ford had a mechanical IP turbo 7.3 for about 3 months) Besides starting with a larger displacement engine, it could build more boost and not kill itself. Cummins was high boost from the start.

The few crazy people who still like 6.2 or 6.5 engines seem to think the GEP Navistar cast block and heads are the ultimate. However, even they will point out that a 6BT of any vintage will run away from it. As will the Ford and Duramax. My take on that is cost and simplicity. I saw a few threads were people are putting Duramax/Allison combinations into square body trucks. $10K just to get an engine/transmission and tcase with most of the computers and wiring. Then they have to do coolers, intercoolers, body lifts, Ford front axle swaps, cross members and frame gussets. I don't think I have $10K total in the 7 square body trucks, 14 6.2 or 6.5 engines and assorted transmissions and transfer cases.

The point of the turbo lecture? Treat it as a constant low boost or in need medium boost and very sparse full boost option and all will last a long time. Any more and even a 6500 won't last.

Oh, I really don't mind the thread hijack because you will notice I hijacked it from Joe in the first place.


Back to my project. We removed the 90° HMMWV/4x4 6.5 oil filter elbow from the 6500. I went to spin it over today and no oil psi. This happened with my HMMWV pull out 6.2 now in my M715 a few years ago. I learned then and relearned today that the oil filter on the adaptor will not work hanging down like normal. The outside holes are too close to the O-ring seating surface on the block. A regular 4x2 6.5 or any 6.2 oil filter is what needs to be on there.


Once we got it spinning we did a compression check. 380 was the lowest with 400 or so normal on 7 of the cylinders. #3 which had 0 before the head swap would work up to 100-110, but no more. The cylinder walls looked good and clean when we had the head off. I hope it is a stuck ring or something from sitting a few years that will fix itself. I really don't want to pull it all apart again after just buying new head gaskets, valve cover gaskets, head bolts and oil pan gasket. So we are going to put on the injector lines and try to fire it up. Probably some time next week if all goes well. Then we will recheck compression while of course monitoring temperatures for each cylinder with it running.
 

richingalveston

Well-known member
1,715
120
63
Location
galveston/Texas
I plan to make an engine swap in the near future, I want to get the rest of my build done first.
Keep us posted on the intake install. I plan to use the 6500. Doing a cummins or d-max is not worth the money and a 1009 does not need that much.

If the 6.2 or turbo intake does not work, It would be easy to make a custom intake. Not any different than doing headers.

I plan to be home Saturday working on my exhaust. All the pieces are there, I will know for sure this weekend if my front exhaust cross over is going to work.
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks