Search results

the whole thrust of this law seems to be that MV's don't meet Federal Standards. Sure they were designed for off-road use, but so is every 4x4 and/or all-wheel-drive sedan these days. They were also designed for on road use ... What federal highway standards don't MV's meet? If they meet all...

Has anyone been able to ascertain the reasoning or basis why this proposal was introduced in the first place? What problems now exist that requires new action that was not previously in the vehicle code/law ..Why some years are OK and others are not? Emission standards, size, weight class...

picture might help even more.. Mike

here's the press release/analysis by WI DOT themselves: http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/library/research/law/docs/trans-123.pdf sorry, this will be the opposite program from the yellow font above, maybe too small to read.. Mike

a friend of mine is doing some research and has asked me for help: here's his request: "...I am trying to find photos of the big WW2 7-1/2 ton 6x6's built by Federal, Reo, Sterling, Biederman, and even a few by Corbitt. Most of these were C-2 wreckers and F-1 tractors, but some were outfitted...

1952 gmc m135 brush truck 3/3 1952 gmc m135 brush truck 3/3

1952 gmc m135 brush truck 2/3 1952 gmc m135 brush truck 2/3

1952 gmc m135 brush truck 1/3 ebay auction item # 270424739743 auction ended: Jul-18-09 10:24:45 PDT sold @ $1351.00 w/ 11 bids location: Edgewater, NJ, United State 1952 M135 BRUSH TRUCK, 6CYLINDER GAS MOTOR, WATER TANK(MISSING PUMP), 4800 MILES. POWER SHIFT TRANS, PTO WINCH, AIR OVER HYD...

1988 Oshkosh DA-1500 ARFF 8X8 Articulated Fire Truck 3/3 3/3

1988 Oshkosh DA-1500 ARFF 8X8 Articulated Fire Truck 2/3 2/3

1988 Oshkosh DA-1500 ARFF 8X8 Articulated Fire Truck 1/3 ebay auction item # 220443265414 auction ended: Jul-06-09 20:45:31 PDT did not sell @ $21600.00 with 6 bids (reserve not met) buy it now price was $34900.00 location: Elkhorn, Wisconsin, United States link: 1988 Oshkosh DA-1500 ARFF 8X8...

one more pic..from an ebay ad.. 1943 Marmon-Herrington Mike

I didn't think you could edit the thread title? I know you can edit the body of the message.. When you hit edit, it only shows the body of the message, not the title line..Wouldn't you have to delete the complete message/thread and re-post with the same thread but a new title? Mike

sorry for the M# mis-label , should be M46A2C...duh.. :roll: nothing like screwing up possible future searches...oh, well.. remember ' photo van ' as your search term..:-D too bad you can't edit post titles like you can with the message body..... Mike edit, found out below (see post #9)...

M-46A2C Photo Van as RV 3/3 M-462AC Photo Van as RV 3/3

M-46A2C Photo Van as RV 2/3 M-462AC Photo Van as RV 2/3

M46A2C Photo Van as RV 1/3 the recent thread ( http://www.steelsoldiers.com/deuce/37207-m35-s-280-vs-m109-inside-outside-dimensions.html on M109 VS Deuce w/ S-280 shelter considerations, reminded me of this recent ebay offering.. was there a specific M # for this configuration? Were a...

I, for one, would like to see a few pic's of the S-280 on your Deuce if possible.. Mike

So they just appeared after 21 Jan 2009? Mike Maybe a museum or such could get them preserved..

is there a list somewhere that lists the additions/improvements/parts/whatever that went into the deuces that were rebuilt to the latest spec's. Are those the late model USAF types or ? After what year would a deuce be considered to be rebuilt to the 'newer specifications'? Mike edit..I'm...