Search results

Why would I pull a turbo off a 6.5, when I already have the banks system for the 6.2? Granted the Banks needs rebuilt, but I already have it.

I never had a chance to drive the 6.2 before tearing the truck apart and I've not owned another diesel. I don't have any options around here to drive either a 6.2 turbo or 6.2/nv4500 let along both .

Im 50/50 here. How well does a 6.2 turbo do pulling, on 37's? With the 6.0 be overkill with 4.56?

I still have not seen any numbers from a Stans install to prove the performance gains, but I am completely open to them if the number prove their $600 value. I think there is a fella in MI that has a few NV4500 swaps with the 6.2. Maybe I need to go drive one and see how the old diesel responds...

I do emergency response and need to get out in all types of weather. Heck two years ago in -20 I did a 10 hr drive to rescue my sister in law. I was considering running the headers and not the turbo to have less stress on the engine and a cleaner engine compartment. I've heard the Stans are...

I don't think I would turbo the 6.0, 325HP and 350TQ should be plenty to scoot the truck, especially being back by a NV4500. A cam swap to keep the TQ low and a tune would be all it needs. I do like the 6.2 and Banks, but it sure does make the engine bay tight and hard to work on (just my...

skinny, that's my exact though. The 6.0 is a great power plant, with lots of possiblites. The 6.2 is as simple as they get, and the banks will add decent power. UGH. What to do.

I have both the 6.0 engine and 6.2 already with the Banks turbo on it. I also have a 93 6.5 with a turbo, but I'm not going there.

I have an option of either putting the 6.2 banks setup back in my M1008 or installing a late model 6.0. I will be running a NV4500 with either one. Anyone have any thoughts on which is better. This will be a used truck for normal around town hauling, some highway use, trailer pulling ect. I'm...