WSUCougarx's M561 Gama Goat Acquisition and Build Thread

Steel Soldiers is supported by:

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Just like all my build threads, there will be plenty of pictures and explanations of what I did. A thread wouldn't be complete without the recovery story...right? Here's the exhaustive version.

Before the recovery...
For sometime, I have thought about the potential of owning ones of these unusual looking military vehicles. Not really sure what it was. They certainly aren't the most attractive looking vehicles I have seen. In fact, one of the main reasons I don't care for the M35A3 were the headlights being spread so far apart. Kind of gave the Igor appearance...well the Gama Goat certainly took on that look. It wasn't until my family and I vacationed and did an extensive road trip through Alberta, Canada in 2011. On our return trip, we cut through Montana on down to Polson, Montana. That's were I saw my first M561 Gama Goat in MERDC at the Miracle of America Museum. At that time, she had a very weathered FOR SALE on her. She looked to be in pretty good condition and I inquired about the sale price on her. At that time, I thought the price was a bit much. At the time, I didn't realize how few were available. Sure they come up time to time but really there aren't too many out there. So I passed on this Gama Goat and just kind of forgot about them until this year.
So here we are, present day, my wife says we need a boat. "A boat?" I ask. But why? She asks what if the Wynoochee Valley floods and we cannot get to town? Hmmm, I thought. Naturally,as a MV enthusiast, my thoughts didn't turn to a little dingy or some kind of fishing boat. Rather, my first thought was a MV with amphibious capabilities. First to mind was a DUKW, USMC AAV, and the Gama Goat. The first two MV were quickly dismissed due to unavailability and cost. Naturally, the M561 was the MV to get. So I started my search and surprisingly found about a dozen available throughout the USA and just down the road from me. They had varying conditions and huge sweeps in prices. Some with titles and most with just a bill of sale. Here in Washington State, a bill of sale will get you nothing. I needed a title and that quickly took many off the possible list. I was willing to drive up to 2,000 miles away but luckily I didn't have to do that. There were two Goat in contention. Three with titles in Wyoming or one in Montana. I ended up making the drive to Great Falls, Montana.

Recovery Day....Days (October 8-10)

So after getting the details all worked out, I was ready to head to Great Falls, Montana. I was stuck in a bit of a pickle and worked out many different ways and plans to get this recovery done. The easiest...rather the best possible plan was my Marathon recovery plan. Why did I have a Marathon plan? My son had his last double header for Little League Fall Ball on Oct 10th. My son loves baseball more than anything else. I couldn't have him miss his last set of games due to his dad wanting another truck. So I worked out my plan to make a marathon for the truck and be back for his games. Seemed simple enough...at least on paper;-)
An outstanding steelsoldier by the handle quarkz (Tony) offered up his 18' Big Tex car hauler for my Montana recovery. I couldn't have done it without Tony's help. Thanks again Tony!
The first leg of the trip would be to pick up the trailer in Kennewick, WA. So on October 8th, I worked my 9 hour shift at work and got off at 1700 hrs. I quickly drove home, got changed, jumped in my truck and left the house by 1740 hours. Destination was Kennewick which was about a good 5 hour trip to Eastern Washington. It ended up adding about 180 miles onto my trip. My son and I arrived at Tony's around 2230 hours. We got the trailer hooked up and were on our way. My plan was to make a rest stop at Lookout Pass, MT. However, if you know me, I am a mission oriented guy. My mission was Great Falls, MT... not Lookout pass. So once I got to Lookout Pass at 0230 hours, I kept going. My plan was to venture down to the next rest area closer to Missoula, MT. I pulled into the rest stop only to find all the spots were taken up and tractor/trailers. They kind of made their own parking spots along the on-ramp. So I just kept going. I approached Missoula and felt I could make it another 20 or so miles. Well, that 20 or so miles turned into driving another 200+ miles. I ended up taking HWY 200E. I didn't realize this was a back country road type of route. I mean there was absolutely nothing out there. At least I couldn't see anything at 0500 hours in dense fog. Well, the fog seemed to make me a bit more tired so I decided to pull over at a turn out. I didn't quite gauge my approach correctly and overshot the gravel lot only by 10 ft. So I went to back up and felt there was resistance when I was trying to back the trailer up. I got out and tried to survey what was going on in the dark using the red marker lights for illumination. I looked on the ground and saw the rear passenger tire on the trailer was digging into the dirt. Hmmm, was the bearing frozen on that axle? Was there something wrong with the tire? I ran my hand over the tire and felt the unusual tread. The tread felt very uneven. I ran back to the truck and grabbed a flashlight. I went back to the tire and saw there was a piece of firewood on the ground. It was acting like a tire chock on the said tire. I then realized that's why the tire dug in. Then my focus went to the tread. Oh crud!! There was tire tread separation!!!! She was preparing to blow on me. Luckily Tony had put a brand new spare tire on the trailer. My son and I quickly changed the tire. What are the chances of that scenario playing out with the firewood being right there and me thinking to run my hand over the tire in the dark. That was all God my friends. He was looking out for me that night for the days loaded trip. That tire would have let go on the way home with a load! So now the sun was starting to come over the horizon. I initially pulled over to take a 10 min cat nap but now I was wide awake. Hmm, what else is going to happen unplanned on this trip I thought. My attention was now to secure another spare time for the trip home. In fact I pondered buying an extra tire and wheel to have on hand should the need arrive. The saying "It is best to have and not need rather to need and not have" went through my mind.
My son and I made it into Great Falls, MT around 0800 hours. I have officially been up for 26 hours straight at this point. I located a Tire Factory and shelled out $140 for a spare trailer tire. I would have bought a spare tire/wheel but they didn't have one. Our next stop was the Gama Goat sellers house.
We got to his house. I went to make sure everything was in order for the trailer and quickly realized I had a serious problem...a very serious problem indeed. A problem that would jeopardize this entire mission. In my mission oriented hurry to get to Great Falls, MT I neglected to make sure everything was in order with regard to the electronic brake controller and the trailer brakes. I wasn't too concerned with trailer brakes when I was unloaded. In fact, I couldn't even feel that trailer behind me. The newly purchased (for this recovery) Tekonsha P3 Electronic Brake Controller had the dreaded "TRAILER NOT CONNECTED" was flashing on the red screen upon setup. Oh crud I thought...now what? I cannot possibly challenge those mountains passes hauling a load without trailer brakes! Luckily the seller was an electrician so we spent an hour troubleshooting the issue. The entire time I was thinking I just made the 1050 mile trip for nothing! Having sleep deprivation coupled with any kind of minor issue kind of amplifies whats going on into a major issue. My mind was mush and I couldn't think straight. After all the troubleshooting, we found the issue in my truck's trailer plug. The electric brake plug was highly corroded and seems to be much more narrow compared to the other plugs. So I scraped the plug and the guy widened the plug. BOOM! We now had brakes...whew!! Now the attention turned to the MERDC Gama Goat before my eyes. I test drove her for about 15 min and agreed to buy her. We got her loaded onto Tony's trailer. Loading was easy as Tony had replaced the fenders to a wider configuration. We drove to town, got the paperwork taken care of and hit the road at 1430 hours.
My son and I didn't want to take 200E due to our almost blow out tire experience and the fact there was ZERO cell phone coverage. Should I have any issues, I would want to have cell phone coverage especially if I were carrying a 7200 lb load. So we chose a different route to Helena and then west to Missoula via HWY 12. Well, my navigator was too involved with his Nintendo DS and forgot to tell me to turn. I didn't realize we had overshot our exit until we were about 25 miles south of Helena at a rest area. I had attempted to take another one of my 10 minute cat naps. As soon as my eyes closed, I got a text from work asking how my trip was going. I made the mistake of responding which turned into another message which turned into another message..... Out of curiosity, I went to check the map on my phone to see how much further our exit was. Then I realized we were way south of our exit. Once again, no sleep for me. At this point, I am on my 34th straight hour of being awake. So I fired the truck back up and headed north to Helena to our exit. Hmm, HWY 12 yah won't do that again with a load. I neglected to see it had a high mountain pass. I quickly learned when I was about half way up to the summit. I quickly thought that HWY 200E didn't seem too bad. Glad I did that pass. Now I had better confidence to tackle Lookout Pass with my truck and a load. One thing I realized, my mission oriented mind neglected to see the beauty that was all around me. I looked to my left and right, while traveling hwy 12, and noticed the sweeping mountains and the brilliant fall leaf colors . Oh my goodness, God's beautiful creations have been all around me but I haven't noticed any of it. Well, the rest of the trip was nothing more than just driving, check my load, driving check my load, etc. Driving at night made me a bit nervous in that I really couldn't see anything in my mirrors. Rather than do the 80 MPH in MT, I settled for 55-60 MPH. I didn't want to take any unnecessary risks (I guess sleep wasn't part of the plan). I drove and drove and drove. I made it a rest area just east of Lookout Pass and decided to officially take my first rest brake. At this point, I have been up for around 42 hours straight. I ended up taking about a 30 minute nap and hit the passes. I drove another 500 miles before really having to stop for rest near Moses Lake. I was seriously starting to hallucinate. I was starting to see double and seriously couldn't keep my eyes open. I had to physically keep my eye open with my fingers for the last 5 miles to the rest area. I ended up sleeping for 2 hours there. I hit the road again trying to beat time to get myh son home for his baseball games. Then we got the text I was expecting...GAME RAINED OUT. Well now here I was 180 miles from home. I just drove almost 2000 miles in a hurry for my son's game. I see the finish line, I am almost there. Then the game gets rained out.....NO!!!! Oh well, I wasn't too heart broken over it. I was too tired to think about anything else but getting home to my family. Got home and unloaded the Goat.
Oh I almost forgot, part of the Gama Goat recovery plan was to recover a Border Collie puppy on the return trip. Initially I was planning to pickup the puppy in Ellensburg at around 2200-0000 hours on Oct 9. I was delayed by about 8 hours due to 2.5 hours of rest, stopping to check my load, and cruising at 55-60 rather than the posted 70 mph that I had calculated for my return trip. I got about 23 MPG unloaded and 15.5 MPG loaded in my 2001 Dodge Ram 2500 HO Cummins 6 spd manual. So ,my son and I had some extra company for our return trip home. The weather was absolutely beautiful in Montana, Idaho, and Eastern WA. As soon as we hit Snoqualmie Pass, the rains hit....that figures. Oh well, the Goat got her shower.
So all in all, it was a good trip. Only had the two issues (trailer tire and electronic brakes). Since I was on a marathon run I told my wife we would only be stopping for fuel and rest. So she packed the cooler full of water, powerade, PBJ's, and a couple meat sandwiches. That's all we ate.

Trip Mileage Log:
08OCT15:
Worked from 0800-1700 hours. Drove home and left the house at 1740hrs
Montesano,WA to Kennewick,WA (Tony's Place where the trailer is)- 399 miles (4 hrs 39 min)
Kennewick,WA to Ritzville,WA (First Fuel up)- 96.2 miles (1 hr 29 min)
Ritzville,WA to Lookout Pass, MT (Suppose to have been the 1st rest area-kept going)- 152 miles (2 hrs 23 min)
Lookout Pass, MT to Great Falls,MT via I-90 to MT-200E(Gama Goat pickup location,2nd fuel up)- 277 miles (4 hrs 21 min)
Great Falls,MT to Helena, MT via I-15S- 97.2 miles (add 40 miles for overshooting and driving back to Helena) (Time no longer counted...slow going!)
Helena,MT to Missoula,MT via US-12W(3rd Fuel up)- 114 miles
Missoula, MT to Ellensburg,WA (4th Fuel up,picked up Linayla)- 369 miles
Ellensburg,WA to Montesano, WA- 187 miles.
Total miles for entire trip 1,691.4 miles (Add about 15 miles for tire in Great Falls and getting lost in Great Falls...darn GPS) so about 1711 miles. Not bad for a couple days and no sleep;-)


So why did I settle for this particular Gama Goat over the rest?
1) It had a registered Title
2) Still in original military configurations as she was released from the military (minus a few parts)
3) Had the swim panels mounted in the rear of the tractor (never seen them before)
4) Had foldable troopseats and side racks still installed.
5) Tubs fully sealed without demil holes in them.
6) Was in my price range
7) Starts/Drives/Brakes/Steers
8) Closest one within recovery distance
9) Was in my favorite state...Montana!
10) Again, had a registered Title!
 

Attachments

Last edited:

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Chronological History of the Gama Goat

Chronological History of the Gama Goat
http://www.vought.org/special/html/sgamaa.html

March 1947
Drawings created by Roger Gamaunt’s depicting his first layouts of a six- wheel, two- body, articulated vehicle which would ultimately develop into what we now know as the “Gama Goat”. Drawings are now in author’s files.
January 1959 Chance Vought initiates a New Product Development program by the name of “Project Breakout” to explore other fields of design and manufacturing apart from its historical place in the military aircraft industry. One of the projects is a large machine that will process bed sheets from motels or large table clothes from restaurants. The articles will be feed in at one end of the device, be transported thru for cleaning, drying and delivered out the other end all folded ready for delivery. A prototype was built but ultimately the project was not successful. The one successful project was that of the Gama Goat whose history of development follows. Two other military vehicle programs were subsequently initiated as a result of the companies venture into the design and development of new military vehicles. These two programs are briefly reviewed later in this history.
July 23, 1959 First contact made between Roger Gamaunt and Chance Vought Corporation. Gamaunt has already begun detail layouts of proposed suspension, roll tube assembly and casting for light-weight, differential housings.October 2, 1959 “Contract CV288 was signed by Chance Vought and Roger L. Gamaunt of Fawnskin,California, which provides that Mr. Gamaunt will manufacture a full scale prototype of a six- wheel rough terrain vehicle known as a Gama Goat. The vehicle was to be completed by Gamaunt 8 months and one week after the date of the contract and delivered to Chance Vought 10 months and one week after date of contract. The contract provided for certain partial payments to be made to Gamaunt during the performance of the contract.” Reference # 1
The contract stipulated that ”After the prototype vehicle has satisfied Chance Vought’s purposes and in the event Chance Vought has no further need therefore, Chance Vought shall transfer title to the vehicle, if then available, and shall return it to Gamaunt, F.O.B. Dallas, Texas, in it’s “as is” condition at that time”
October 1959 Machine equipment (mill, lathe and riveting equipment) shipped on loan by Chance Vought to Fawnskin, California (Gamaunt’s shop) to assist him in building the first prototype.
October 2, 1959 “A license agreement dated 2 October with Mr. Gamaunt provides for licensing to manufacture and sell Gama Goat throughout the world in consideration of payment of certain royalties to Gamaunt. Chance Vought agreed to apply for a patent on Gama Goat in the name of Gamaunt at its expense”. Reference # 1
April 13, 1960 Patent application filed for a “Gama Goat” configured vehicle. Patent #183991,”Vehicle”, is issued May, 1965. Figure 1A - Figure 1B
May 1960 Author joins Gama Goat design group.
July, 1960 Due to slow progress at Gamaunt’s Fawnskin facility, the decision is made to return project for completion at Chance Vought plant in Grand Prairie, Texas.
”During the course of the program Mr. Gamaunt experienced several problems which had adverse effects on the program schedule. During February 1960, a change in gear train required the re-order of major components including a 3-speed Willy’s transmission and clutch in lieu of the existing 4 speed Corvette transmission. At the same time new sets of differential gears had to be reordered. These new components necessitated redesign of other related components. Complications were also experienced by long lead time requirements of such items as axles and wheels, which further effected schedules. In an effort to expedite the program, the tractor and carrier body shells of the vehicle were fabricated at Chance Vought. Both bodies were completed and shipped to Gamaunt in June 1960.” Reference # 1
“To insure readiness of the vehicle for the 24 October demonstration, the complete (sic) vehicle was transferred from Gamaunt in California to Chance Vought for completion, including the addition of several modifications and refinements. This included customer verification of Chance Vought recommendations to improve vehicle road clearance from 9 to 15 inches and increase the tire size. A change from a 3-speed transmission to a 4-speed (Mighty Mite?) and a specially designed transfer case utilizing M-38 internal gears was made as a result of the larger tires was also made. A total of 80 gallons fuel capacity was provided with two integral tanks incorporated into the front hull structure. The vehicle was shop complete on 30 September 1960.Vehicle shake-down was conducted on 1 and 2 October in preparation for Chance Vought field tests. The Gamaunt-Chance Vought contract was amended to agree with the program changes.” Reference # 1
The ability to realign the prototypes manufacturing schedule and completion and subsequent expedited modifications as a result of testing was the result of a small group of very dedicated individuals at Chance Vought. The good working relationship between the Gama Goat engineering design group and Experimental Manufacturing meant that the prototype evolved with a minimum of actual, formal drawings.
September 30, 1960 Corvair engine powered prototype “rolls out”. Figure 1
October 1960 Initial test program completed including mobility, airlift and swimming/flotation evaluations. Figure 2Figure 3
“Chance Vought tests of the vehicle began on 4 October 1960 and were scheduled for a period of three weeks in view of the 23 October demonstration date. However, difficulties experienced in the steering system necessitated redesign and thus postponement of the demonstration. To insure sufficient time for design and thorough testing of the steering system, as well as more thorough testing of other features of the vehicle, demonstrations were rescheduled to begin on 9 January 1961.Postponing until after the first of the year was also considered desirable in view of almost certain demonstration interruptions that would occur during the December holiday season Interim fixes were incorporated in the steering system to permit testing of other features of the vehicle until the new steering system was incorporated. The tests were conducted within the general vicinity of Mountain Creek Lake, where good testing conditions exist. The vehicle was subjected to rough terrain, ditch, mud, steep slope, highway, flotation and helicopter lift tests. The results definitely proved that the vehicle concept was sound. In each of the test conditions, the vehicle met or exceeded mobility expectations”. Reference # 1
Fall 1960 First marketing film “Gama Goat” produced.
December 31, 1960 Name changed from Chance Vought Aircraft, Incorporated to Chance Vought Corporation.
January-May 1961 Prototype demonstrated in United States at Ft. Benning Infantry School, Ft. Knox Armor Board, Ft. Monroe CONARC, Ft. Belvoir, D.O.D .,USMC Hq. Quantico, Detroit-Ordnance Tank Automotive Command (OTAC),and Ft. Sill Artillery Board.
“The primary objective of the demonstration tour was to show that the vehicle concept was sound. During the course of the demonstration the vehicle was subjected to practically every known and available mobility obstacle. This included such conditions as mud, steep slopes, rough terrain, salt water, salt rock, rock beds, snow, sand and vertical walls ranging up to 30 inches in height.
In each case the Gama Goat performed well and made very favorable impressions on military observers. The objective sought in the demonstration was attained”. Reference # 1
March 1961 An unsolicited proposal is submitted to government for 1¼ ton, Corvair powered Gama Goat “Concept Vehicle”. Proposal is later rejected by government as being premature due to planned competition for a 1¼ Ton vehicle planned for August, 1961. OTAC recommends centering efforts on upcoming competition.
April 1961 Doctorial Study approved (Mover Study) that would eventually lead to 1¼ Ton procurement program.
May 1961 An aggressive marketing program is undertaken along with scheduled, off-site vehicle demonstrations. During the month of May alone 27 individual government procurement agencies, military bases and Washington offices are visited. Figure4
May, 1961 A study is completed of a comparison of Ackermann steering (as used on the prototype) versus various combinations of ram steering. It is concluded that the existing Ackermann steer system design is the best overall approach.
May 4, 1961 “On 4 May 1961 the vehicle performed in a mobility evaluation conducted by the Ordnance Tank Automotive Command (OTAC) at Auburn Heights, Michigan. A variety of vehicles of the Gama Goat class participated. The results again showed that the mobility of the Gama Goat exceeded that of the conventional vehicles.” Reference # 1
June 1961 Prototype had accumulated over 5000 miles during demonstrations; durability mileage accumulation and performance tests (including water propulsions and drag, highway rolling resistance and handling evaluation with front body only).
June 1961 Development Project Approved (OCTM 37758) for 1¼ Ton High Mobility, Development Program. .
Summer 1961 Chance Vought initiates a design program based upon prototype characteristics and directed towards new 1¼ Ton requirements. Figure 5
September 1961 Prototype demonstrated to American 7[SUP]th[/SUP] Army, Heidelberg Germany, German Army Technical Command, Trier Germany, French Air force, Paris, France and French Army Satory, France. The Goat was air-lifted from Dallas to Düsseldorf, Germany and driven to the various test sites accumulating a total of 1000 trouble-free miles. Up to this point in time the critical driving during demonstrations was accomplished by Roger Gamaunt.
November 7-8, 1961 Prototype participates in Tactical Mobility Symposium, Ft. Knox.
December, 1961 Military characteristics (MC’s) established for “Truck, Utility, High Mobility, Light Duty, XM561”.The XM561 was to replace the venerable but outdated M37,3/4 ton,4x4.
January 1962 1 1/4 Ton initial design completed. Chance Vought becomes a division of Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.
January 2, 1962 RFPD 62-22, Research Engineering Purchase Description for Truck, Cargo, 1 1/4 Ton, XM561 published.
March 30, 1962 Proposal submitted for XM561.The proposal contained the options for two different engines which were the General Motors (G.M.), air cooled, gasoline, Corvair or the G.M., 3-53, two-stroke, diesel, water cooled, with an aluminum block. In addition, provision was made for nine special operating kits including, winch, weapons mounts and personnel heaters.
June 1962 Government makes initial selection of winning contractor for XM561 program.
July-August & October-December 1962 Corvair prototype participated in extensive mobility evaluations and engineering performance tests (author driving) conducted by Advanced Research Project Agency (ARPA) in Thailand’s jungles, rice paddies and canals. Tests were to evaluate vehicles capabilities in the Southeast Asia terrain. The vehicle was based in Bangkok, Thailand and was driven on public roads to most of the test sites in both Northern and Southern Thailand. Overall performance was considered quite good while experiencing a minimum of mechanical problems. At the conclusion of the activities, the vehicle had accumulated a total of over 7300 miles since initial roll out in September,1960.A movie of the Thailand operations,” The Goat In Thailand”, was produced by Chance Vought and widely distributed and shown for marketing purposes. A stop with the vehicle on the way back to the United States was made in Hawaii to give a demonstration to local military personnel. Figure 6 - Figure 7 - Figure 8
August 1962 Government gives final approval of LTV as the successful bidder for the XM561 competition.
January, 1963 LTV starts XM561 preliminary design with G.M., 3-53 diesel engines for two “Test Rigs”. Design effort required the creation of 24 individual procurement specifications to ensure individual components met requirements specified in the RFPD.
March 1963 LTV awarded contract for 2 Test Rigs (XM561) and 14 Prototype vehicles. Nine vehicles will incorporate the special General Motors 3-53 aluminum block and head, diesel fuel (only) engine (XM561). Five prototypes will have an experimental air cooled, aluminum, 2-stroke,”V” design, 102 H.P., Lycoming multi-fuel engine XM561(E1).Go ahead is given for fabrication of the two Test Rig with go ahead for the remaining Prototypes is given later in May 1963.
The expedited production and testing of “Test Rigs” was a new concept implemented by the procurement agency.
“Past experience has shown that many pilot model vehicles (military prototypes) experienced major failures and problems early in the test cycle causing extensive delays and sometimes cancellation of programs. Some of the vehicles were fabricated under extremely expedited conditions or with limited funds. Lack of suitable materials or component development programs meant installation of experimental or modified commercial components increasing the risk of a vehicle intended for type classification and production. These vehicles, in effect have been “Test Rigs”. The following definition of a test rig has been formulated based upon discussions with AMC and ATAC personnel”.
“A test rig is a full scale; operable vehicle built under expedited conditions generally representing the military prototype vehicle .It is desirable that it incorporate the maximum components of the military prototype vehicle. The purpose is to provide the manufacturer and government an opportunity to appraise performance, configuration, utility, human factors, maintainability and many other aspects of vehicle design. In, addition, the familiarization and training of manufacturing personnel are of inestimable value. It is intended to augment, not replace, the prototype vehicle and many changes are expected from test rig to military prototype.”
“It is understood that two test rigs are to be fabricated: one for the manufacturer and the other for government evaluation……”
“The tests described in this plan are intended to determine basic compliance of the test rig vehicle with many of the requirements of the Military Characteristics. Also, to eliminate major design defects and establish general suitability of the vehicle before fabrication of the military prototype vehicles”. Reference # 2
Testing was ultimately conducted on a 7-day,24 hour schedule on Test Rig #2 at Aberdeen Proving Ground with the author as the on-site Field Engineer. Results and problems observed during these tests of both test rigs were factored into the design of the following Prototype vehicles, where practical. The Chrysler XM410 (2½ Ton Cargo Truck) and Ford XM656 (5 ton cargo truck) programs were undergoing development at Aberdeen under the “Test Rig” development concept at the same time as the XM561.
April 1963 A wooden mockup of the proposed XM561 configuration is constructed.
May 14-15, 1963 Engineering Design Review meeting held in Grand Prairie plant with government representatives to review overall vehicle mockup and proposed kits.
Government mandated items included the requirement that a spare tire and appropriate tire changing tools be provided in the vehicles design.
July 1963 XM561 Technical Development Plan approved.
July 1963 A comprehensive engineering study is completed of the location for a spare tire. Eight different locations are considered, none of which are suitable without some compromises to overall vehicle performance, access and a myriad of other factors. A swinging spare tire horizontal mount on the right side of the front body is determined to be the least intrusive.
October 1963 XM561 Flat Bed Feasibility Study submitted at the request of the U.S. Marine Corps. Study examined the possibility of converting the cargo body to a flat bed type. Two configurations were examined but nothing ever came of the proposal.
November 1963 Corvair Prototype demonstrated at Ft. Benning. Figure 9
November 1963 Transfer begins of management and design personnel for XM561 program from Grand Prairie to Warren Ordnance Plant, Warren, Michigan as LTV Michigan Division. Move was mandated by the Government as condition for getting development contract. A few key project personnel elect not to move to colder country.
December 1963 XM561 # 1 (S/N 3E-3108) Test Rig rolls out and begins in-house testing at Grand Prairie, Texas. Early failures include yielding of lower suspension arms (beefed up), failure of wheel hub flange(torque limiting) shear bolts (replaced with conventional bolts), front body tilted to left (eventually incorporated split fuel tanks to even out front body weight) and a myriad of other smaller structural and component problems. A total of 681 miles were accumulated on highway and off-road including swim tests, prior to shipment to Michigan where testing was continued. In Michigan, highway and cross country mileage accumulation continued along with swim evaluations, engineering structural tests, brake system and rolling resistance measurements, trailer towing and five-wheel operations. Figure 10 - Figure 11 - Figure 12 - Figure 13 - Figure 14 - Figure 15 - Figure 16 - Figure 17 - Figure18
January 1964 An unsolicited technical proposal for a 1-Ton, 2-wheel amphibious Cargo Trailer and other trailer configurations is submitted by the LTV Michigan Division. The proposal is never implemented.
February 1964 # 2 Test Rig rolls out, goes thru shakedown in Grand Prairie and is delivered to Aberdeen Maryland Proving Ground for performance and projected 20000 mile durability testing. During performance and durability tests a number of significant problems are encountered. These problems include power train failures (axle shafts, differential ring gears, and limited-slip clutches - improved parts incorporated), poor brake system performance and durability (ultimately the conventional “open” drum type brake is replaced with “sealed” type), and overall swim performance was considered marginal due to low speed and minimal freeboard. The test environment that the vehicle was subjected was much more severe than any of the vehicle designers could have imagined (including the author).I sent back to Michigan, for the designers to see, a bottle of abrasive mud slurry the Test Rig was encountering at Aberdeen’s Perryman #4 test course, which was migrating into and wearing out the brakes shoes, steering joints and u-joints. These problems necessitated extensive redesigns. Overall, the vehicle was thought to be “maintenance intensive”. Nevertheless the vehicles mobility capabilities were considered to be excellent. From the experience with # 2 test rig it is decided to remove the spare tire (a get home truss kit to be used instead), add bilge pumps and flotation chambers as well as other modifications. A weight reduction program was instituted. Figure 19 - Figure19A
April 1964 Government Coordinated Field Test Plan approved.
1965 Under contract to U.S. Army Mobility Command, LTV Michigan Division prepares The Early Support Concept Plan (ESCP).The objective of the plan is to “provide improved material readiness and implementation of an effective, economical support plan by the Army-Industry Team”. This would include concurrent development and integration of logistic support, training and performance methods for the XM561 program thru and including depot overhaul. The program is never implemented.
January 1965 SAE Paper 961C published, dated, January 1965, ”The XM561 Cargo Truck-A Breakthrough in Mobility”, Robert E. Zimmerman, U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Center
January 1965 LTV Michigan Division contracts with Gamaunt to overhaul modify and upgrade the Gama Goat Corvair Prototype vehicle. This work includes design of new transfer case, adapting a 4-speed Corvair transmission, redesign of center and rear differentials, reworking front body to accommodate four people and rear body for fold-down tailgate,(precluding swimming), painting vehicle international orange color and a multitude of other items. Work to be completed 30 July 1965.After the vehicles rework was completed, it was used for demonstration purposes before it was finally relegated to an LTV owned, executive getaway ranch in South Texas.
January - May 1965 XM561 and XM561 E1 Prototypes vehicles # 3 - # 16 are completed and delivered for military evaluation. Producing the remaining vehicles was done under a very tight and hectic schedule. One problem was in having the time and personnel in Michigan to accumulate a few break-in miles prior to delivery to the customer. On several occasions the author drove a completed vehicle home at night and took neighbors for rides in order to get mileage. Not the normal procedure but effective. In another instance the author accompanied a vehicle for delivery to the Marine Base at Quantico, Virginia. Arriving on a Friday, the first use of the vehicle was to fill the rear body with ice and beer for the weekly weekend party. The author was not impressed!
Kits are designed, manufactured and delivered for evaluation at various military test sites.
Kits include: Arctic Kit,XM561 (-65 F), Personnel Heater (-25 F),100 Ampere Power Source, Slave Cable, Winch, Radio Mount, Multipurpose Shelter, Front Line Ambulance, Machine Gun-7.62MM,Recoiless Rifle 106 MM, Mortar 81 MM Davey Crocket XM28 and XM29,Mortar 4.2 inch, Mortar 107 MM XM95,Arctic Kit,XM561E1(-65 F),Heater Kit-Ambulance-Arctic and Tow Weapon System. The concurrent development of kits is a “first” for the military and will insure that the M561 will be fully capable of performing all assigned missions upon deployment. Prototype # 5 is designated “Incentive Fee Vehicle” which will be used to provide an additional fee to the contractor if minimum target maintenance hours of not more than 100 unscheduled or 500 scheduled maintenance hours are accumulated over a 20,000 mile test cycle at Aberdeen Proving Ground. The vehicle accumulates 117.3 unscheduled hours (exceeding goal of 100.0 hours) while accumulating 268.4 scheduled hours (beating goal of 500.0 hours). Prototypes are tested at various sites from Alaska to Panama. Tests of vehicles and kits include engineering tests, service tests, climatic evaluation, air dropping, endurance and reliability evaluations. It is the goal to accumulate 20,000 miles on most vehicles. Due to nature of testing, some vehicles only accumulate around 5000 miles and some finish with as much as 36,000 miles. Primary overall test mileage accumulation of 232,500 was finished by March 1966. This eventually lead to the design being determined as acceptable for U.S. Army use and type classified Standard “A” in June 1966. Figure 20-Figure 21 -Figure 22 - Figure 23
The advent of user testing of so many vehicles brought with it a new series of problems and component failures. In addition, not all problems that needed resolution as a result of test rig experience could be incorporated in the early prototype vehicles either due to long component delivery dates or man power shortages to engineer “fixes” in a timely fashion. At times it seemed to the author that frequently there was not enough time to do the job right in the first place but always time to do it over. As a result, a fairly extensive “Deficiency/Modification Program” was required for field installation of mod kits. These modifications now had to be installed by military field personnel with guidance by LTV field engineers. A series of service bulletins was instituted to further assist military field personnel. In the end, all the work did get accomplished. Due to the around the clock test schedule, “Friday afternoon breakdowns” were fairly common due to the military test drivers not wanting to have to work over the weekend. Also, there was only one spare parts expediter assigned in Michigan which made for delays when spares were needed at some remote military test site.
March 1,1965 Automotive Industries magazine publishes an article titled “Army Mobility-The XM561”, by Major Robert L. Bergquist, Project Manager,XM561 Vehicle, U.S. Army Mobility Command, Warren, Michigan. Article discusses status of overall vehicle development program.
June-August 1965 XM561 Test Rigs #2A and #2B are tested in Thailand under the contract to Advanced Research Projects Agency. Purpose of tests is to determine ability of vehicles to operate under the various environments in Thailand. The two additional Test Rig vehicles were added to the initial contract for the XM561 development program. Vehicle #2A was provided with a front mounted winch and standard tires and vehicle #2B was modified from the base design with a front mounted winch, wide Goodyear Terra tires with power steering at front and rear steered axles. In addition, a water propulsion kit consisting of an outboard motor and mounting bracket were fitted to the rear body. In Thailand, the vehicles were driven by Wayne Mueller, LTV Field Engineer, to all test sites resulting in the combined total of 7035 miles during the various test operations which were similar but more extensive and covered a greater geographical area as compared to the tests performed on the Corvair Prototype in 1962. Figure 24 - Figure 25
June 1965 Contract awarded to LTV Michigan Division for four XM561 Advanced Production Engineering (APE) vehicles, kits, field support services and technical data package necessary for subsequent industry wide competitive procurement. Delivery to be complete by April 1966.
July 1965 “Noise level tests were conducted at Aberdeen Proving Ground to determine sound pressure levels of the vehicle under various operating conditions. The primary purpose was to determine whether the noise levels generated by the vehicle were within the limits specified by HEL Standard S-1-63A.The sound pressure levels produced by the vehicle exceeded the limits specified in the standard”. Reference # 3
Excessive “noise” levels would plague the vehicle through its deployment and necessitate the use of ear protection by driver and co-driver. Ear protection would become the norm in later military vehicle programs due to the utilization of noisy diesel engines and their close proximity to the driver and co-driver.
September 1965 Further tests were conducted in Thailand with a standard and flotation type Terra Tired XM561 test rigs and other wheeled and tracked vehicles to further assess operating capabilities over open roads and paddy fields. It was concluded that “further resources be allocated to the development of articulated vehicles”. Terra tires dramatically improve soft soil mobility but are a problem due to increase in overall width on narrow jungle trails. Only major mechanical problem encountered was with several failures in the power steering system on the Terra Tired Vehicle.
January 1966 Office of the Project Manager for XM561 Program prepares a staff study to consider a “Compromise Width Tire Kit” as a result of recent Thailand tests. The conclusion is that “The XM561 is satisfactory for operations in Thailand if the tire is optimized at the largest size width permissible without requiring the use of a power steering system”. . No such recommendation is ever perused. Reference # 4
February 1966 Author voluntarily left LTV to join another aircraft company in a military ground vehicle development program.
August 1966 Production contract put out for bid with six bidders responding. Initial schedule calls for delivery of 15274 vehicles over the years 1968-1972 along with spare parts and field support. G.M. diesel engine is specified and further use of Lycoming, air-cooled engine is terminated.
February 1967 Consolidated Diesel Electric is successful bidder in M561 production contract. Actual contract is awarded in June 1968.

The average quoted price per vehicle for the 13,050 Army vehicles:
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Consolidated Diesel Electric Co. (CONDEC)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]$ 8,485.00[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Ford Motor Co. [/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]$9,849.38[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]LTV Aerospace Corp. with Kaiser Jeep Corp. [/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]$10,266.42[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Baifield Industries[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]$10,831.00[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Bowen-McLaughlin-York Co.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]$11,857.84[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]American Military Products Organization. Inc.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]$11,882.00[/SIZE][/FONT]
Relative pricing and rank order for the 2,224 Marine vehicles were similar to that shown above. The gross contract differences between CONDEC and Ford was $21 million and LTV was $28 million.
“The feeling was that the Ford and LTV quotes were reasonable and in the ballpark for a decent profit. Ford was lower than LTV possibly due to the desire to use this contract as a foundation for opening a new assembly plant in Mt. Clemens, Michigan at which they had plans for the assembly of two other vehicles”. Reference # 5
The general theory was that CONDEC “low-balled” the bid with the possible intent to make any shortfall in subsequent “additional cost design changes”. (Author’s opinion).
February 1968 Detroit Diesel Engine Division, General Motors Corp. received a definitive contract from the Army for 15,624 aluminum, 103 H.P., 3-53 diesel engines.
August 1969 Testing of preproduction vehicles delivered under contract begins at Aberdeen Proving Ground. Eventually an M792 ambulance version was developed.
January 1970 SAE Paper, 700015, “The M561 Cargo Truck-The Gama Goat”, H.W.Austrow, Consolidated Diesel Electric Co. and Leonard Kelt, U.S. Army Tank Automotive Command.
Summer 1972 Author observed aluminum body remnants of numerous XM561 and XM561E1 Test Rig vehicles in Toledo, Ohio scrap yard. Figure 26
August 1972 Problems in manufacturing and performance of the production M561 vehicles led to a great deal of controversy and ultimately an inquiry by a House Armed Services Subcommittee. The following are excerpted comments reported in two different columns in the August 9, 1972 issue of “Army Times”. “After years of frustration and tests, the lawmakers said, the Army has fielded a vehicle $10,000 more expensive than planned. It features a bad design, sloppy craftsmanship, operational, maintenance and other problems, they said. While racking up repeated test failures, the report charges, the Army nonetheless continued to produce the Goat. The first 4400 vehicles were delivered to Army depots to await correction of major defects. Those vehicles are still awaiting retrofit of defective gears manufactured by a foreign (British) subcontractor, the subcommittee said.”(Authors note-the original Test Rigs had successfully proven the design and durability of the Rockwell (American) gear train for the specified 20,000 test miles per vehicle and those were the components that led to Type Classification of the Goat and subsequent production go ahead. Changing the component supply sources from that which was tested appears to have been a major mistake).
The second column stated “The problems were so numerous that the Army changed its reliability yard-stick. Instead of requiring that the Goat go 10,000 miles without a major component failure, the new rules said it had to have a 94 percent chance of going 75 miles without breaking down. The first 4400 vehicles were delivered, but testers and operators reporting hundreds of deficiencies ranging from the complete absence of a rear driveshaft assembly to stripped gears and leaky brake cylinders. The 4400 Goats were put in storage, to be retrofitted later.”
Later models have most of the bugs ironed out, and the Army is keeping those”. (Authors note-“The lowest bidder may not always be the lowest qualified bidder as the tax payer often learns. It is important to test before you buy, but equally important to buy what you tested”.
19?? Warren, Michigan ground vehicle operations are closed down. With this closure, a group of very dedicated and experienced design, test and field engineers are split up and a great deal of military vehicle development and test experiences is scattered to the winds. It was the authors intent to fill in the closing portion of the history of the Michigan Division with a scheduled visit to Vic Civiletto in Dallas in the early Summer of 2007.Unfortunately,Vic’s untimely passing before the visit could be accomplished ended any hope of obtaining the desired information. The author knows of no other key person still living that could be of help.
19?? Per the contractual agreement the Corvair Prototype in returned to Roger Gamaunt in Fawnskin, California.
Late 1980’s M561 vehicles finally phased out of military inventory. While the production version of the Gama Goat proved to be a highly mobile vehicle, it was beset by mechanical problems, excessive crew cab noise and the need for special driver training due to the vehicles unique handling and steering characteristics (steering was not self centering). The Goat was ultimately replaced by the more conventional M998, 4X4, High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV). Nevertheless, the importance of vehicle articulation and independent suspension with high suspension travel combined with relatively wide, large diameter, low pressure tires did have a positive and lasting effect upon future military vehicle designs.
A number of surplus M561’s were bought and restored by private individuals. There is a real cult following as evidenced by the referenced Gama Goat web site which is the conduit for information for these enthusiasts.
May 1980 Roger Gamaunt sold Corvair powered prototype to author for one dollar and other considerations. Author picked up Prototype Gama Goat in Fawnskin, California and transported it to Reno, Nevada where it was used as a support vehicle in tire traction testing (authors testing company) for several years. The vehicle which had been stripped of all paint when picked up was finally repainted olive drab when it was retired from other duties. A refurbishment was completed in 2007 and the vehicle and all associated documentation await a permanent home in some suitable museum.
 
Last edited:

mkcoen

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
5,596
139
63
Location
Spring Branch, TX
Congrats Mike! Glad you could find one close to home. Now comes all the fun :). Word of advice, change the fan belts NOW!
 

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Nice Mike!
Looking forward to seeing what you do with her.
Thanks, it's probably going to be my slowest build thread to date. I've got to pay off the recovery expenses first and then work on the mechanical items first. Want to go through this entire vehicle before I start on cosmetic type stuff (ie:bearing repacked, brakes, steering, bushings....)

Nice! But buying one that runs is kinda cheating isn't it?:D

It looks like a nice complete truck!
It is;-) Just trying to eliminate a few unknowns as I can to minimize keep the cost down with this build.

Forgot to ask is it an Army goat or USMC?
Looks like it was last assigned to an Army unit.

This ought to be a good one. Make us proud Mike!
I will try;-). I feel the pressure mounting. Going to be a slow process as my time and the availability of parts is a bit of a challenge. At least some of the maintenance parts are readily available.

Congrats Mike! Glad you could find one close to home. Now comes all the fun :). Word of advice, change the fan belts NOW!
Roger that Mark! Got that on the list;-)
 

mkcoen

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
5,596
139
63
Location
Spring Branch, TX
I forgot to mention that you went through my old neighborhoods. I went to HS in Grangeville, ID and to the U of I in Moscow so know Hwy 12 extremely well. That road is a sunny 6 lane interstate compared to some of the roads through the Smokey Mountain National Forest that a certain other SS member directed us through (yes, I know I agreed to the road but it was still nerve wracking). Be glad it wasn't January when you picked it up though. Lola Pass gets a fair amount of snow.
 

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Title Transfer and Collector Vehicle Plates

Today, I went down to our local licensing agency to take care of the paperwork. I got the Montana title transferred to a my name and got signed up for Collector Plates (30+ years). Really looking forward to starting this project. Going to get this thing cleaned up really well first. Got some degreaser soaking in the engine compartment. Want to have a clean pallet before I get started.
 

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Draining Fluids and New Radiator & Crankcase Drain Kit

Over the past couple days I've been trying to get the interior tub cleaned up. There must have been a good 1" of pine needles mixed with oil and grease caked along the bottom of the tub. I used about 2 qts of Simple Green to get things freed up and then just used a high pressure hose to wash her out. Once I got her cleaned I got to staring at the radiator and noticed the radiator hose date was 2-70!! Yikes, time to replace the hose. Once I had the hose off I looked into the radiator and noticed she was just caked with white stuff. Well, knowing the year of this truck and not knowing how long she sat. I decided to order a new radiator off E*** from Saturn Surplus for $250+14.95 shipping. The radiator is P/N: 11601346, Alt P/N: 3008259, NSN: 2930-00-081-9583 Well, since I was in there I might as well drain the oil. Wow!! What a mess that made. My once clean tub is now dirty again so since I was in there, I decided to drain the transfer case. Which led to the tranny. Which led to the differentials etc etc. So now, she is completely drained of all fluids. I pulled the batteries and located them across the garage should I forget her empty state. With huge oil mess I went ahead and ordered one of those nifty oil drain valves. I got the Fumoto Oil Drain Valve T-201N (NPT 3/4-14) on E*** for $18 shipped.
I plan on ordering a new thermostat, belts, and whatever I can get my hands on. Don't want to run into preventable maintenance issues that could ruin my nice little milk run truck;-)
Oh, I also discovered that both fuel tanks had a nice red color when I peered through the fill up hole. Looks like I need to drain the fuel off Off-road Diesel also. I also need to drain the front and rear steering boxes. Tony (Quartz) gave me three tubes of Cornhead Grease to fill up the cases. Thanks Tony!!!
 

Attachments

Last edited:

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Pics before I bought her

Here are some pics of the Goat before I bought her. I haven't had any time or opportunities to take any pics. Been down with some kind of flu bug and just haven't been motivated to do much of anything.
Funny thing is, I was just perusing the internet and found my Goat featured in an article:
http://bangshift.com/bangshiftxl/bu...t-owning-this-military-glorious-semi-failure/ Hmmm, wonder if I should be getting royalties now;-)
 

Attachments

Last edited:

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Gama Goat Technical Manuals-More before I bought her pics

I found some room in the garage;-) Going to be my winter project.

TM 9-2320-242-10..........Operator: General Maintenance
TM 9-2320-242-10-1.......Operator: Installation and reference data
TM 9-2320-242-10-2.......Operator: Scheduled Maintenance
TM 9-2320-242-10-3.......Operator: Trouble Shooting
TM 9-2320-242-10-4.......Operator Maintenance
TM 9-2320-242-20...........Organizational: Motor Pool maintenance
TM 9-2320-242-20-1........Organizational: Tech Manual, volume 1 of 3
TM 9-2320-242-20-2-1.....Organizational: Tech Manual, volume 2 of 3
TM 9-2320-242-20-2-2.....Organizational: Tech Manual, volume 3 of 3
TM 9-2320-242-20P..........Organizational: Parts, motor pool maintenance
TM 9 2320-242-34............Organizational: Rebuild, motor pool maintenance
TM 9 2320-242-34-2-1......Organizational: Rebuild, motor pool maintenance
TM 9-2320-242-34P..........Organizational: Rebuild Parts, motor pool maintenance
TM 9-2320-242-35............Field Support: direct support, general support
TM 9-2515-214-34............Direct General Support and Maintenance Engine GM 353
TM 11-2300-372-14-5.......Operator/Organizational: Radio Installation
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Amer-team

Active member
1,700
3
38
Location
Centralia/WA
There is a parade in Elma at about 1100 on 11 Nov if you are available to turn out. Anything green would be appreciated. The 1SG and I will be there.
 

wsucougarx

Well-known member
6,952
29
48
Location
Washington State
Elma? That's only 10 miles from me. Hopefully, I have that day off on the schedule. I'll let you know when I get back from vacation in a bout a week or so.
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks