Search results

I have asked that question to the trailer experts at TACOM, where they are the be all end all experts to anything military trailer related. And they didn't know.. No kidding, that's the 100% truth.

Unless there is a specific part that people need and will pay "non surplus" prices for, I don't see it being profitable. Look at the A2 fuel tanks that flooded the market (just like the windshield frames) that were selling for $100 brand new or less. I replaced my tank just because I got a...

you have the original parking brake on the shaft?

the VCO3TO is the registration number.

I never saw the upper picture type in my time in the Army. But we had the lower type, and a third type that had the smaller rubber part of the lower picture integrated into the larger piece.

I'd just go with the rubber ones. even the old 2 piece would work.

Read the TM. It is all explained in them.

Whilst tires and rims are you running?

Yes, if you can find a new motor for them.

Maintenance records usually get thrown out/deleted when the trucks are turned in to DRMO. Very few trucks reach GL with them.

Which bases? The SINCGARS or the VRC-12 series?

Read the VRC 12 series TM's. They explain everything.

No

An official US Army picture taken at APG...

An 80 Amp generator???? Perhaps you mean 60?

I has the first 3 MTS systems in the Army. We put them 3 PLS's, and BN SPO had the master control station. Didn't work worth a dam. Good to see they got it going!

I had the first versions of Applique +, POSNAV, and MTS when I was at Hood in 97-01... It was called FBCB2 and now BLUEFOR Tracker... The first versions of MTS totally sucked.

He was a good guy, I liked his posts, and I met him a time or two at MV shows... RIP.

weld them up

MTS systems need the satellites and ground stations to make them work? Uncle Sam won't be surplusing the satellites any time soon. So other than to look cool, it has no purpose in civy hands.