Hydronic Heat Exchangers Damage Water Pump?

[Shakkles]

Hey what's up gang. So I was just about to pull the trigger on a 60-plate heat exchanger unit for my "engine coolant to habitat hot water" system when a thought occurred to me.

So, i'm cramming all this engine coolant coming from the engine into this "series of plates" whose job it specifically is to create a cramped and turbulent series of chambers. Won't that, in theory, dramatically increase the wear on my engine's (Cat 3116) water pump? Or am i worrying too much about a non-issue "because it's a big beefy diesel-engine water pump and won't even notice the added work required to move that coolant?

Thanks in advance.

 

[Ronmar]

1. Coolant circulating pumps on engines are not positive displacement pumps. They create a small pressure differential and move fluid but they do not really build any pressure and do not really react to blockage except that the coolant doesn’t flow…

2. Unless you are putting it in the main line between engine and radiator(upper radiator pipe), it is not really possible to block up the main flow to any significant level, and even if it were in that line it would effect engine temp before it would effect the pump.

how exactly are you planning on plumbing it? If I were doing it I would plumb it similar to the heater circuit. With the output just before the thermostat and the return on the inlet side of the pump, same as the heater is plumbed. The heater has a thermal control valve that opens or blocks that line so a similarly plumbed flat plate would equally un effect operation of the engine, except to perhaps further delay engine warmup if you are running the pump in the habitat to transfer heat…

flat plates do have narrow passages, that do create a lot of turbulence which is good for transfer efficiency, but it has a LOT of passages so is actually quite a low flow restriction… I use one on my slow speed diesel generator and it circulates coolant via Thermosiphon, which is flow due to density change reacting with gravity(warm rises, cool settles) which is a very low energy process intolerant of flow restriction. It works great…

 

[Shakkles]

1. Coolant circulating pumps on engines are not positive displacement pumps. They create a small pressure differential and move fluid but they do not really build any pressure and do not really react to blockage except that the coolant doesn’t flow…

2. Unless you are putting it in the main line between engine and radiator(upper radiator pipe), it is not really possible to block up the main flow to any significant level, and even if it were in that line it would effect engine temp before it would effect the pump.

how exactly are you planning on plumbing it? If I were doing it I would plumb it similar to the heater circuit. With the output just before the thermostat and the return on the inlet side of the pump, same as the heater is plumbed. The heater has a thermal control valve that opens or blocks that line so a similarly plumbed flat plate would equally un effect operation of the engine, except to perhaps further delay engine warmup if you are running the pump in the habitat to transfer heat…

flat plates do have narrow passages, that do create a lot of turbulence which is good for transfer efficiency, but it has a LOT of passages so is actually quite a low flow restriction… I use one on my slow speed diesel generator and it circulates coolant via Thermosiphon, which is flow due to density change reacting with gravity(warm rises, cool settles) which is a very low energy process intolerant of flow restriction. It works great…

Heya Ronmar, and thanks for responding.

You gave me some good info but the primary question i was hoping to figure out was "is this going to put more stress on the water pump and thus shorten it's lifespan." Being a mechanical water pump, i'm glad to hear the data you mentioned about it not reacting much to blockage, but once that "small blockage" is indeed in the line it's not something that's "occasionally on", it'll be "constant" and providing a small amount of blockage, but continual blockage every second the engine is running which i would think would accumulate wear quickly. I just remember blowing through two waterpumps on my old '74 land cruiser and the culprit was eventually identified as merely "one aftermarket fitting slightly too small that bottlenecked the coolant line for all of 1 inch.

To answer your question though, yup I was thinking about installing it before the thermostat so in-fact "in the main line" and "not in the overflow line" as some have done. Also my M1078 does have the armored variant's A/C in-cab system swapped in so i believe, perhaps, it has a different heater-core integration then the regular? That's just what i was told back in the day.

 

[Ronmar]

Ok, so how exactly are you going to put this INLINE(all the main flow passes thru it) BEFORE the thermostat, considering the thermostat is in the housing and bolted to the side of the head?

 

[Shakkles]

Ok, so how exactly are you going to put this INLINE(all the main flow passes thru it) BEFORE the thermostat, considering the thermostat is in the housing and bolted to the side of the head?

Oh, to clarify i didn't necessarily mean "the heat exchanger would be directly before the thermostat with nothing else in between." I'm still figuring out the best way at this point.

Originally i planned to slot it in after the block and before the radiator to capture the heat before it's cooled, but i've since realized i'd prefer to slot it as "directly before the block" as possible. The reason is because although I do want to benefit from capturing heat from the engine to heat my habitat water but that isn't the primary goal. The primary goal is to pre-heat the engine from the hab during winter to hopefully eliminate, or at least reduce, my reliance on the energy-hungry block heater during the winter, so going straight into the block seems to be the most efficient way.

 

[Ronmar]

Ok, unless you are having something very custom built it will be virtually impossible to put a heat exchanger in the main line/flow path… it would have to be something like the transmission heat exchanger(2.5” inlet and outlet ports?)… if it was in the main line, how would you get heat into the engine to pre heat it as the engine coolant only circulates when the engine is running?

 

[Shakkles]

Ok, unless you are having something very custom built it will be virtually impossible to put a heat exchanger in the main line/flow path… it would have to be something like the transmission heat exchanger(2.5” inlet and outlet ports?)… if it was in the main line, how would you get heat into the engine to pre heat it as the engine coolant only circulates when the engine is running?

I mean, i was just going to come right off of, or in front of, the lines running to and from the radiator. Which are very large gauge lines indicating a large volume of coolant flow needed. That's what i'm concerned about; The necessity of reducing that (something like) 2 inch coolant line down to 1 inch for the heat exchanger. It seems to me one of two things *must* happen in this scenario as a result; Either the flow will be 50% less, or the pump will instead work itself 2x harder (i'm just guessing randomly on the numbers) to push the same volume of flow through narrower causeways.